Connect with us

News

Does iPhone SE or Galaxy A51 have the better camera? Here are the pros and cons

Published

on

img-3745-2

Lexy Savvides/CNET

The Samsung Galaxy A51 is a $400 (£329, AU$599) powerhouse with four cameras that give flexibility for photography, from ultra-wide to macro. But Apple’s new iPhone SE, despite only having one rear camera, has smart photography features borrowed from more expensive models such as the iPhone 11. Here’s how these two $400 phones compare on everything from portraits and landscapes to video recording.

Read more: iPhone SE 2020 is proof that Apple won’t actually bring back the tiny phone


Now playing:
Watch this:

iPhone SE or Galaxy A51: Battle of the $400 phone cameras



6:13

The Galaxy A51 has more cameras for variety

Right off the bat, the Galaxy has four rear cameras: a 48-megapixel main camera at f2, a 12-megapixel ultra-wide, a 5-megapixel macro camera and a depth sensor. The iPhone SE has a single 12-megapixel rear camera at f1.8.

But while the variety sounds great on paper, in practice, I found myself getting a lot of use from just two out of the four. The depth camera, for example, doesn’t actually take photos. It’s only used for live focus (or portrait mode) shots.

img-3760

Lexy Savvides/CNET

In addition to using the main camera, I found that the ultrawide camera on the Galaxy A51 was handier than the macro camera and it was the main thing I missed when taking photos on the iPhone SE. That’s because I was able to shoot a larger area without physically having to move back. Use the sliders on the image below to see the difference in perspective from the wide to ultrawide camera.

That’s not to say that the A51’s macro camera is a dud. For macro photos, there’s no contest: The Galaxy A51 can capture photos at a much closer reach than the iPhone SE, although you need a lot of light to get the best out of this camera. I got the best results when taking photos of plants outside on a bright sunny day, while anything I tried to snap indoors turned into a blurry unfocused mess. 

20200426-103205

One of my successful macro photos.


Lexy Savvides/CNET

Also, there’s no optical image stabilization (OIS) on any of the Galaxy A51’s cameras, unlike the iPhone SE which has OIS on the rear camera.

Neither phones have optical zoom so I relied on digital zoom to get closer to objects — 5x on the SE and 8x on the A51. Both produce an acceptable shot at 5x, but the iPhone’s image looks less oversharpened and “crunchy” than the A51.

Galaxy A51’s vivid photos vs. the iPhone SE’s natural look

The Galaxy A51 has a scene optimizer that’s turned on by default. The camera automatically detects the subject in the frame, like food or landscapes, then enhances the photo. It makes colors pop off the screen, but in some cases, particularly with photos of food or flowers, the scene optimizer makes images look too oversaturated. The iPhone SE produces a more natural-looking shot, which I like more than the intense colors from the Galaxy A51. Your personal preference may differ from mine.

Both the Galaxy A51 and iPhone SE have an HDR mode to help balance out shadow and highlight detail, and both phones did such a great job that I found it was hard to separate HDR performance from one another.

When I looked at photos at a reduced magnification on a computer screen, there wasn’t much to separate the two on anything except for color saturation. But when I looked closer at the 100% crop, many photos I took on the regular Galaxy A51 camera looked less detailed than the equivalent iPhone SE shot.

Portrait and night mode are closer than you think

Both phones can help make your subject pop by blurring the background to achieve a similar effect to a photo taken on a DSLR at a wide aperture. 

The iPhone pulls off this blur or “bokeh” effect more naturally, especially if you’re taking the effect to extremes and want to blur the background as much as possible. But the Galaxy A51 has better edge detection thanks to that depth camera, so there was more definition between my subject and the background. At times, fine details like hair confused the iPhone SE, so some of these details got lost in the background blur.

The iPhone SE can only take portrait mode photos of people, while the Galaxy A51 works on any subject, including pets. You just need to make sure your animal friend stays still while you take the shot.

Only the Galaxy A51 offers a dedicated night mode for taking photos in low-light situations. While this sounds great for the A51 on the surface, the iPhone SE is able to take comparable shots even without such a mode. The iPhone SE produced a usable night photo as long as I kept my hand steady. But I needed to do the same for the A51 when using night mode. 

The Galaxy A51 captures more sharpness and preserves highlight detail than the iPhone SE at night, but not by much. It also outputs a smaller, 8-megapixel file when using night mode.

Selfies are more natural on the iPhone SE

Although the Galaxy A51’s front-facing camera offers more megapixels (32!), the iPhone SE produces photos with more natural colors. To my eye, the Galaxy A51 oversaturated the red channel so much so that my brown hair looked almost copper in some selfies. The A51 captures a sharper shot overall than the iPhone SE’s 7-megapixel front camera, but the iPhone’s colors and skin tone look more true-to-life.

For video resolution though, the Galaxy A51 has the upper hand. It can take  4K video from the front-facing camera while the iPhone SE maxes out at 1080p. You can see a sample from both in the video on this page.

The iPhone SE takes the edge for video

I filmed the entire video on this page on both the iPhone SE and Galaxy A51 and found that the iPhone definitely performed better overall here. In good light, the image looks cleaner with less noise than the Galaxy and OIS on the iPhone makes a huge difference when recording video. Clips I recorded handheld at 4K looked super smooth on the iPhone SE compared to the same resolution on the Galaxy A51, which doesn’t have any OIS. You can get digital image stabilization at 1080p on the Galaxy and it helps if you’re filming handheld.

The iPhone can also film at 4K/60fps, while the A51 can only film at 4K/30. Autofocus on the Galaxy A51 isn’t as smooth as it is on the iPhone SE. For a lot of clips, especially when filming a static subject, I had to lock the focus before filming to keep things smooth. I noticed the autofocus twitching when filming a moving subject on the Galaxy A51. On the iPhone, movements looked smoother and more cinematic.

Audio from both is fine, but the iPhone sounds fuller and rounder compared to the clips from the Galaxy, even though both phones record in stereo.

Does the iPhone SE or Galaxy A51 have the better camera?

Both these $400 phones have capable cameras that bely the retail price. The Galaxy offers more flexibility if you want to be able to switch between different scenarios like using ultra-wide or macro. But the iPhone has stronger video recording and, in some cases, the camera captures more detail at full magnification. Regardless of which phone you choose, you’re getting a lot of camera for your buck, but personally I’d choose the iPhone SE for its stronger video recording. I’d pick the Galaxy A51 if I wanted the flexibility of an ultra-wide lens.

News

Aliexpress Standard Shipping vs ePacket – For Which One You Should Go For

Published

on

Aliexpress Standard Shipping vs ePacket - For Which One You Should Go For

Aliexpress Standard Shipping vs ePacket

Want to know the difference between these two shipping modes? With which shipping method you should go?

Out of Aliexpress Standard Shipping and ePacket, which is cheaper? Then no worries. We are here with a closer look at –Aliexpress Standard Shipping vs ePacket. We will help you out to figure these two available shipping ways.

Aliexpress Standard Shipping

Aliexpress Standard Shipping and the company is the top e-commerce site and property of Alibaba Group. Aliexpress Standard Shipping is not the cheapest delivery option but it is a reliable choice.

AliExpress offers shipping options for every taste and budget:

  • For those who are in a hurry.
  • For those who are not.
  • With extra fees.

With Aliexpress Standard Shipping, the parcels usually arrive within 15-45 days.

You will see the tracking number of the parcel on the product’s details page when the shipment is sent. You can track the location of your package also.

Aliexpress Standard Shipping follows different chain:

Seller-> Aliexpress Warehouse->Courier->Customer.

ePacket

As the name implies, the shipping service was designed for e-commerce. It helps the customers to receive parcels quickly from online stores and marketplaces that shipped out from China and Hong Kong.

Before ePacket, products were shipped to the US from China via sea. This was a long journey, and shipping took a long time.

However, ePacket has its own requirements. The maximum length of a package is 24 inches (60 cm) and the total length, height, and thickness of the package cannot be more than 36 inches (90 cm).

Additionally, the package cannot weigh more than 4.4 lbs (2kg). Through ePacket, the product can be delivered to 35 countries.

Shipping time may vary and depends on the destination of the package, customs, holidays, and other delays. On average a package takes 10-20 days to arrive from the United States.

Aliexpress Standard Shipping vs ePacket

The two shipping methods that we are going to explore are AliExpress Standard Shipping and ePacket. Compared to the other free shipping method, AliExpress Standard Shipping and ePacket can cut down shipping time for a few days.

To know which is the best shipping option, consider the advantages and disadvantages of each shipping method.

Aliexpress Standard Shipping- Advantages

  • It provides free shipping to some destination countries like the USA.
  • Products are packed in good quality packaging.
  • Packages usually arrived within 15 to 45 days.
  • Provides many shipping options according to your choice.

Disadvantages

  • Packages usually arrived within 15 to 45 days.
  • It is ideal for small packages.
  • Sometimes you need to pick up your parcels.

ePacket Shipping: Advantages

  • The estimated shipping time is 7 – 30 days.
  • It is cheaper than other shipping services.
  • ePacket is faster than other standard shipping methods being used in China.

Disadvantages

  • ePacket is not available worldwide. ePacket delivers the products only in 35 countries.
  • There is a limitation on the size and weight of parcels.

Which Shipping Method Should I Go With- Aliexpress Standard Shipping vs ePacket?

According to my choice, you should choose ePacket as it is faster and more reliable.

From our experience, AliExpress Standard Shipping generally has a slower delivery timeframe than ePacket. But if it isn’t, then AliExpress Standard Shipping should be your next best choice for affordable shipping and package delivery.

Summing it Up On :

Aliexpress Standard Shipping vs ePacket

This is all about Aliexpress Standard Shipping vs ePacket. Hope you are able to figure out which shipping method is best for you.

Give your feedback in the comment section below.

Thanks for reading!

Is AliExpress Banned In India? Can It Be Banned Soon?

Continue Reading

Gaming

IT ministry banned 118 more apps including PUBG: Here’s the full list

Published

on

The Indian government once again banned 118 Chinese applications. The name of PUBG is also included in these apps. 118 other mobile applications of China have been banned by the IT Ministry.

The Ministry of Information Technology had received several complaints from various sources, stating that users’ data is being stolen incorrectly through some mobile apps available on Android and iOS platforms. 

Here is the full list of apps banned by the government on September 2:

Other Apps which are banned by the Government are :

21.Tencent Weiyun

22.Pitu

23.WeChat Work

24.Cyber Hunter

25.Cyber Hunter Lite

26. Knives Out-No rules, just fight!

27.Super Mecha Champions

28.LifeAfter

29.Dawn of Isles

30.Ludo World-Ludo Superstar

31.Chess Rush

32.PUBG MOBILE Nordic Map: Livik

33.PUBG MOBILE LITE

34.Rise of Kingdoms: Lost Crusade

35.Art of Conquest: Dark Horizon

36.Dank Tanks

37.Warpath

38.Game of Sultans

39.Gallery Vault – Hide Pictures And Videos

40.Smart AppLock (App Protect)

& 10 Bands Equalizer

 

61.Web Browser – Fast, Privacy & Light Web Explorer

62.Web Browser – Secure Explorer

63.Music Player – Audio Player

64.Video Player – All Format HD Video Player

65.Lamour Love All Over The World

66.Amour- video chat & call all over the world.

67.MV Master – Make Your Status Video & Community

68.MV Master – Best Video Maker & Photo Video Editor

69.APUS Message Center-Intelligent management

70.LivU Meet new people & Video chat with strangers

91.Murderous Pursuits

92.Tencent Watchlist (Tencent Technology

93.Learn Chinese AI-Super Chinese

94.HUYA LIVE – Game Live Stream

95.Little Q Album

96.Fighting Landlords – Free and happy Fighting Landlords

97.Hi Meitu

98.Mobile Legends: Pocket

99.VPN for TikTok

100.VPN for TikTok

101.Penguin E-sports Live assistant

102. Buy Cars-offer everything you need, special offers and low prices

103.iPick

104.Beauty Camera Plus – Sweet Camera & Face Selfie

105.Parallel Space Lite – Dual App

106.”Chief Almighty: First Thunder BC

107.MARVEL Super War NetEase Games

108.AFK Arena

109.Creative Destruction NetEase Games

110.Crusaders of Light NetEase Games

111.Mafia City Yotta Games

112.Onmyoji NetEase Games

113.Ride Out Heroes NetEase Games

114. Yimeng Jianghu-Chu Liuxiang has been fully upgraded

115.Legend: Rising Empire NetEase Games

116.Arena of Valor: 5v5 Arena Games

117.Soul Hunters

118.Rules of Survival

Continue Reading

Gaming

PUBG Banned In India : India’s Third Surgical Strike On Chinese Apps !!

Published

on

The Indian government banned PUBG 

A ban is imposed on PUBG as well as on 118 Chinese applications.

The Ministry of Information Technology had received several complaints from various sources, stating that users’ data is being stolen incorrectly through some mobile apps available on Android and iOS platforms. Let me tell you that even before that 57 applications of China were banned, including Tiktok’s name.

India’s 3rd Surgical Strike on Chinese Apps

The Indian government has conducted another digital strike against China. The Ministry of Information and Technology on Wednesday banned 118 mobile applications, including the mobile game PubG. This is India’s third digital strike on China’s mobile apps. Earlier, at the end of June, India had banned 47 apps from China including Tiktok, and then 59 Chinese apps at the end of July. The government has cited national security behind this decision.

Why PUBG is banned in India Now?

The statement said that the government has banned 118 such apps which are a threat to India’s sovereignty and integrity, defense of India, the security of the state, and peacekeeping. It said that the Ministry of Information Technology (IT) has received several complaints from various sources. The complaints also include reports of some mobile app users (users) on platforms such as Android and iOS being stolen and stored on servers outside the country.

It is said in the statement that such information is being compiled, analyzed, etc., which are a threat to national security and the defense of India. These ultimately pose a risk to India’s sovereignty and integrity. This is a very serious issue, which required quick action.

According to data analytics firm Senser Tower,

PUBG Mobile is the world’s highest-grossing gaming app. PUBG Mobile’s lifetime collection is about Rs 22,457 crore. 

PUBG VS Free Fire: Reasons Why Free Fire is Getting More Popular Than PUBG

Continue Reading

Trending